WIP: Pre-final version
This commit is contained in:
parent
7def536787
commit
286e952ec3
26 changed files with 288 additions and 151 deletions
|
@ -21,13 +21,13 @@ in the \acrshort{wdb} object is given in Section~\ref{sec:CARNOT_WDB}.
|
|||
\subsection{Simulink Model}
|
||||
|
||||
The secondary functions of the Simulink model is the weather prediction, as well
|
||||
as communication with the Python controller. A complete schema of the Simulink
|
||||
setup is presented in Figure~\ref{fig:Simulink_complete}.
|
||||
as communication with the Python controller. A complete schematic of the
|
||||
Simulink setup is presented in Figure~\ref{fig:Simulink_complete}.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[ht]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width = 0.75\textwidth]{Images/polydome_python.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{Simulink Schema of the Complete Simulation}
|
||||
\caption{Simulink diagram of the Complete Simulation}
|
||||
\label{fig:Simulink_complete}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ Let $w_l$, $u_l$, and $y_l$ be the lengths of the state vector components
|
|||
$\mathbf{w}$, $\mathbf{u}$, $\mathbf{y}$ (cf. Equation~\ref{eq:components}).
|
||||
Also, let X be the matrix of all the system states over the optimization horizon
|
||||
and W be the matrix of the predicted disturbances for all the future steps. The
|
||||
original \acrlong{ocp} can be rewritten as:
|
||||
original \acrlong{ocp} can be rewritten using index notation as:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:sparse_optimal_control_problem}
|
||||
\begin{align}
|
||||
|
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ original \acrlong{ocp} can be rewritten as:
|
|||
\end{align}
|
||||
\end{subequations}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Python server}
|
||||
\subsection{Model Identification and Update using a Python server}
|
||||
|
||||
The Python server is responsible for the control part of the simulation. It
|
||||
delegates which controller is active, is responsible for training and updating
|
||||
|
@ -182,16 +182,16 @@ the \acrshort{gp} and \acrshort{svgp} models, as well as keeping track of all
|
|||
the intermediate results for analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
In the beginning of the experiment there is no information available on the
|
||||
building's thermal behaviour. For this part of the simulation, the controller
|
||||
building's thermal behaviour. For this part of the simulation, the server
|
||||
switches to a \acrshort{pi} controller with random disturbances until it gathers
|
||||
enough data to train a \acrshort{gp} model. This ensured that the building is
|
||||
enough data to train a \acrshort{gp} model. This ensures that the building is
|
||||
sufficiently excited to capture its dynamics, while maintaining the temperature
|
||||
within an acceptable range (~15 --- 25 $\degree$C).
|
||||
|
||||
Once enough data has been captured all the features are first scaled to the
|
||||
range [-1, 1] in order to reduce the possibility of numerical instabilities. The
|
||||
Python controller then trains the \acrshort{gp} model and switches to tracking
|
||||
the appropriate SIA 180:2014 reference temperature (cf.
|
||||
Python server then trains the \acrshort{gp} model and switches to tracking the
|
||||
appropriate SIA 180:2014 reference temperature (cf.
|
||||
Section~\ref{sec:reference_temperature}).
|
||||
|
||||
For the case of the \acrshort{svgp}, a new model is trained once enough data is
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue