Submitted version of thesis to prof
This commit is contained in:
parent
286e952ec3
commit
56eeb8a95c
21 changed files with 72 additions and 39 deletions
|
@ -3,10 +3,10 @@
|
|||
|
||||
This section focuses on the presentation and interpretation of the year-long
|
||||
simulation of the control schemes presented previously. All the control schemes
|
||||
analysed in this Section have used a sampling time of 15 minutes and a control
|
||||
analyzed in this Section have used a sampling time of 15 minutes and a control
|
||||
horizon of 8 steps.
|
||||
|
||||
Section~\ref{sec:GP_results} analyses the results of a conventional
|
||||
Section~\ref{sec:GP_results} analyzes the results of a conventional
|
||||
\acrlong{gp} Model trained on the first five days of gathered data. The model
|
||||
is then used for the rest of the year, with the goal of tracking the defined
|
||||
reference temperature.
|
||||
|
@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ exhibit similar performance. The spring months already make the controller less
|
|||
stable than at the start of the year, while the drastic temperature changes in
|
||||
the summer make the controller completely unstable.
|
||||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Figure~\ref{fig:GP_fullyear_abserr} presents the absolute error measured at each
|
||||
step of the simulation over the course of the year. We can note a mean absolute
|
||||
error of 1.33 $\degree$C, with the largest deviations occurring in late summer
|
||||
|
@ -74,7 +71,7 @@ occurring during the winter months.
|
|||
\label{fig:GP_fullyear_abserr}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
Figure~\ref{fig:GP_first_model_performance} analyses the 20-step ahead
|
||||
Figure~\ref{fig:GP_first_model_performance} analyzes the 20-step ahead
|
||||
simulation performance of the identified model over the course of the year. At
|
||||
experimental step 250, the controller is still gathering data. It is therefore
|
||||
expected that the identified model will be capable of reproducing this data. At
|
||||
|
@ -334,6 +331,8 @@ This means that the model does not get much more complex as the data is
|
|||
gathered, but instead the same general structure is kept, with further
|
||||
refinements being done as data is added to the system.
|
||||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[ht]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width =
|
||||
|
@ -382,6 +381,8 @@ cumbersome and potentially costly initial experiments for gathering data.
|
|||
\label{fig:SVGP_96pts_abserr}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{SVGP with a five days moving window}\label{sec:svgp_window}
|
||||
|
||||
This section presents the result of running a different control scheme. Here, as
|
||||
|
@ -407,6 +408,8 @@ model, to again learn its behaviour. This cycle repeats every five days, when th
|
|||
controller becomes unstable. In the stable regions, however, the controller is
|
||||
able to track the reference temperature.
|
||||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{SVGP with Linear Kernel}\label{sec:svgp_linear}
|
||||
|
||||
The last model to be investigated is the \acrshort{svgp} with Linear Kernel. As
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue